The apostle, Rom. 6:3-5 is dehorting from sin,
exhorting to holiness and new obedience, and gives this argument from the
necessity of it, and our ability for it, both taken from our initiation into
the virtue of the death and life of Christ expressed in our baptism; that by
virtue of the death and burial of Christ, we should be dead unto sin, sin being
slain thereby; and by virtue of the resurrection of Christ, we should be
quickened unto newness of life; as Peter declares, 1 Pet. iii. 21. Our being
buried with him, and our being planted together into the likeness of his death,
and likeness of his resurrection, is the same with 'our old man being crucified
with him,' (ver. 6) and the destroying of the body of sin, and our being raised
from the dead with him, which is all that is intended in the place.
There is not one word, nor one expression, that
mentions any resemblance between dipping under water, and the death and burial
of Christ, nor one word that mentions a resemblance between our rising out of
the water, and the resurrection of Christ. Our being 'buried with him by
baptism into death,' (ver. 4) is our being 'planted together in the likeness of
his death,' ver. 5. Our being planted
together in the likeness of his death, is not our being dipped under water, but
‘the crucifying of the old man,' ver. 6. Our being raised up with Christ from
the dead, is not our rising from under the water, but our ‘walking in newness
of life,' (ver. 4) by virtue of the resurrection of Christ; 1 Pet. iii. 21.
That baptism is not a sign of the death,
burial, and resurrection of Christ, is clear from hence; because an instituted sign
is a sign of gospel grace participated, or to be participated. If dipping be a
sign of the burial of Christ, it is not a sign of a gospel grace participated;
for it may be where there is none, nor any exhibited.
For the major: if all gospel ordinances are
signs and expressions of the communication of the grace of Christ, then baptism
is so: but this is the end of all gospel ordinances, or else they have some
other end; or are vain and empty shows.
The same individual sign cannot be instituted
to signify things of several natures. But the outward burial of Christ, and a
participation of the virtue of Christ's death and burial, are things of a
diverse nature, and therefore are not signified by one sign.
That interpretation which would enervate the
apostle's argument and design, our comfort and duty, is not to be admitted. But
this interpretation that baptism is mentioned here as the sign of Christ's
burial, would enervate the apostle's argument and design, our comfort and duty.
And therefore it is not to be admitted.
The minor is thus proved: the argument and
design of the apostle, as was before declared, is to exhort and encourage unto
mortification of sin and new obedience, by virtue of power received from the
death and life of Christ, whereof a pledge is given us in our baptism. But this
is taken away by this interpretation: for we may be so buried with Christ and planted
into the death of Christ by dipping, and yet have no power derived from Christ
for the crucifying of sin, and for the quickening of us to obedience.
No comments:
Post a Comment