9.
This objection goes back to the point made in the previous one. It is argued
that if we hold to infant membership in baptism that we must also allow that
all children, regardless of age, who feel disposed to do so, may come to the
Lord’s Table without inquiry or permission from anyone.
This
is not as formidable an objection as it is made to appear. For even those who
reject our principle of identity with regard to circumcision and baptism, do
affirm the identity of the Passover and the Lord’s Supper. This is the key to
answering this objection.
But
before we get ahead of ourselves, let us make an important observation. Every
child is a citizen of the country in which he or she was born. Citizenship is
plenary. There is no such thing as halfway citizenship. Nonetheless, he or she
does not have free access to all the rights and privileges of citizenship until
he or she attains a certain age. One cannot get a driver’s license before his
16th birthday, and even then he must have completed Driver’s Ed. One
cannot even vote until he is 18. Generally speaking, no one finds anything
objectionable in this scheme.
Now
to return to my previous comments about the identity of the Passover and the
Lord’s Supper: Every child of Jewish parents, though full church members by
virtue of their birth and recognized as such by virtue of their circumcision,
were still not allowed to partake of the Passover until they came to a certain
age. This age was not specifically stipulated. Calvin notes that “the Passover,
which has now been succeeded by the sacred supper, did not admit guests of all
descriptions promiscuously; but was rightly eaten only by those who were of
sufficient age to be able to inquire into its signification.” This is why the
law did not stipulate a particular age. What was important was that the child
had attained a level of intellectual acumen sufficient for understanding the
significance of the Passover. The parents knew that the child was ready when
the child began to ask the right questions. When a Christian child, one that
has been baptized, begins to ask the right questions about the significance of
the Lord’s Supper, and has the necessary intellectual capacity to understand
the answers, then that child is ready to partake of the sacrament.
This objection then,
has no force. Better yet, what it alleges and then deprecates, doesn’t even
exist. It is not part of the paedobaptist system. Our system has advantages
with regard to this matter that no one else has. We solemnly bind the church
and the parents to faithfully train up their children in the nurture and
admonition of the Lord while simultaneously recognizing that the church
possesses and must exercise the power of guarding her communion table from
anyone who approaches it profanely, even her own children.
No comments:
Post a Comment