The shield of his mighty men is red; his
soldiers are clothed in scarlet. The chariots come with flashing metal on the
day he musters them; the cypress spears are brandished. The chariots race madly
through the streets; they rush to and fro through the squares; they gleam like
torches; they dart like lightning. He remembers his officers; they stumble as
they go, they hasten to the wall; the siege tower is set up. The river gates
are opened; the palace melts away; (Nahum 2:3-6 ESV)
In this passage we see God proclaiming to
Nineveh a “fate worse than death,” as the saying goes. The second half of verse
one is actually addressed to Israel. They are being told to prepare for their
restoration. This raises another interesting point, something which is spoken
of prominently among all American Christians who are saddened by the moral and
spiritual decline of our nation. Much talk is abroad about national restoration
and it is spoken of as if it were in man’s hands if he could only get the right
man in office. But Scripture uniformly portrays restoration, especially
spiritual restoration, which is the only restoration of interest to the people
of God, as undertaken first and foremost by God. Once God begins the great
work, then man is moved by the Spirit to partake of the grace of what is
efficaciously already at work. Neither does the extent of the damage sustained
by God’s people present a problem to him. One need only to look at the history
of Israel and the spiritual degradation of the nation during the time of the
Judges. Think for instance of the story, the vile, despicable, deplorable story
recorded in Judges 19 of the Levite and his concubine. This story has all the
obscene, horrid iniquity and profane behavior one would expect to read in the
story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Yet this story takes place in
Israel. Imagine the shock of reading an account of the villainous iniquity of
Nero, only to find out that it was not Nero but someone who is supposedly a
Christian! That is what we are supposed to feel when we read Judges 19. The
Hebrew text of Judges 19 is striking when placed side-by-side with Genesis 19.
The author of Judges has copied verbatim several pertinent lines from Moses’ account
of Sodom and Gomorrah with the obvious intent of startling us by attributing to
God’s people the very sins which brought down such fiery wrath against the
Sodomites. Compare this deplorable state of affairs with the latter history of
Israel during the reign of King David.
Those familiar with church history will also
know how deplorable the state of the United Kingdom was, as well as the
American colonies around the time of the First Great Awakening. This knowledge
should be a cause of rejoicing among those of us who, as I said earlier, are
troubled by the devastation we see at work in our society and in the church.
The Church is God’s peculiar people and whenever he deigns to restore and
revive her, no amount of devastation is too much for God’s power to overcome.
The Northern Kingdom had been chastised by
God with the Assyrian rod, and the Southern Kingdom of Judah had been
repeatedly threatened by them. If God had chastised Israel, favored by Him as
they were (Psalm 47:4), how much more would God fatally punish Nineveh, an
idolatrous, bloodthirsty heathen people?
2:3-6 At this point the chapter takes a
decidedly dark turn. Nahum now begins to describe in very lucid detail the
destruction of Nineveh. The whole tenor of the passage becomes very somber and
gloomy. Remember, this is not written to
Nineveh, but to Judah. Nineveh is never given the opportunity to repent. This
is reminiscent of what Jesus says about Sodom not seeing the signs Bethsaida
and Capernaum saw. God does not owe anyone the opportunity to repent.
2:3 The mighty men of V 3 are no doubt the
Medo-Babylonian generals attacking Nineveh. The red shields and scarlet attire
may be one of a couple of options: It could be that they are blood-stained,
which is very likely. It is also possible that they were painted red to create
the illusion of bloodiness to frighten the Ninevite enemies or to disguise the
Medes’ and Babylonians’ own blood so that their soldiers wouldn’t be
disheartened or the Ninevites emboldened. The Greek historian Xenophon of
Athens (430-354 B.C.) actually mentions that the Medes were fond of red attire.
2:4 I am going to go off-topic for just a
moment because of something I see in verse 4. Several years ago when I was a
young kid, I remember reading a book by some self-proclaimed prophecy expert
who prided himself on his ability to read Scripture literally and mocked those
whom he thought were guilty of spiritualizing the text. I don’t really remember
much about the book, I couldn’t even tell you the title, but I do remember that
the author prided himself on being able to see the modern world described in
the ancient prophecies of the Old Testament. For instance, he explained how
automobiles were foretold of by the Old Testament prophets and he cited verse 4
as his proof. You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to see that this is a
ridiculous reading of the passage, especially considering the fact that he
prided himself on his ability to read Scripture literally. This is the same
type of guy, while priding himself on his literal reading of the Bible, will
say that the locusts in the book of Revelation are prophetic portrayals of Huey
helicopters. So I hope they pardon me when I take their expertise with a grain
of salt. These self-appointed prophecy experts have done a great disservice to
the church by their weird methods of interpreting Scripture. They have
virtually destroyed any meaningful attempt at studying Old Testament prophecy.
One of the great principles of the Reformation
was what is called the perspicacity of Scripture. Unfortunately that word is
not very perspicacious. It means the understandability of Scripture. The
Reformers never denied that there are obscure parts or passages of Scripture.
They merely stated that whenever we find a part or passage of Scripture we
should always interpret the more obscure passage in the light of the passages
which are clearer. This is the Reformation principle of Scripture interpreting
Scripture. What these self-appointed prophecy experts have done is turn
perspicacity on its head. By taking a passage such as this which is clearly
referring to the destruction of Nineveh in 612 BC, and seeing in it a reference
to cars driving around on the streets with their headlights on, they have taken
an otherwise clear passages Scripture and made it obscure, if not impossible,
to understand. When the average Joe Christian opens his Bible and reads of the
siege of Nineveh and clearly understands it to be a description of the
destruction of Nineveh, only to find out that it’s actually talking about
motorcars the 21st century, how is he to ever have confidence that
he can read Scripture on his own without the help of the expert who has the secret
code. This is no different than the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church with
regard to Scripture. For centuries Rome forbade Christians to read the Bible
for themselves. They said that because the Scriptures were so hard to
understand it was safer to leave the reading and interpreting of it in the hands
of the Pope and the Magisterium, which is the official teaching office of the
Roman Catholic Church. You need not bother reading the Bible and running the
risk of misunderstanding it and thereby endangering your soul; it is much safer
to leave this all in the hands of the Pope and let him and his Cardinals tell
you what to believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment